[ad_1]
This is an interesting question as I’ve heard convincing arguments for both options. What would it be instead? Underdressed or Overdressed?
Jill Chivers 16 Style Types And in this video I discuss this topic.
Exaggerated Continuity and Personality Type
This is not a black and white question, because in reality the question from overdressed to underdressed is more about where you sit on the continuum and even how you perceive what is overdressed versus what is underdressed.
Regarding the psychological type, Jill thinks the last letter of your four-letter Myers Briggs type code will give you the answer – do you prefer under or over (is that a word or did I just make it up?). The last letter for him – either J (judging) or P (perceiving) is what tells you which one you prefer.
She thinks that Judge types are more likely to choose to overdress because there are limits to which order, structure, and style come into play, in fact, one ESTJ woman told us that if she’s ever been to an event where she’s underdressed, she’s the one. I want to leave immediately. While some Perceiving types have told us about their style when interviewing them, it’s something they would never have thought of and probably wouldn’t have noticed, or I would have thought was funny or interesting (but never would have thought). they must leave the event).
I have noticed in my dealings with FP types (Feeling/Perceiving types – especially Intuitive versions xNFPs and also Sensing versions xSFPs) that those who place high value on style also prefer to overdress, as they are highly motivated by FP types. their personal values. I’ve also met STJ types (Perceiving, Thinking, Judging) who don’t like to be noticed and prefer to be a little underdressed to avoid being inconspicuous (which can make them feel like they’re overdressed). may be perceived as negative for them.
I think xNTPs are more likely to feel more comfortable underdressing than overdressing, while xNTJs are more likely to feel overdressed than underdressed (provided they understand the strength of their personal style and how they communicate).
What Does Underdressed and Overdressed Really Mean?
These are terms that are all about relationships with others. How can you tell by looking at others to see what other people are wearing?
How can you overdress but not be incompatible with those around you? Jill doesn’t want to part with her natural tendency to overdress badly, she wants to be in line with others but still expresses her most stylish self. Because she values relationships and harmony with others (a hallmark of the ESFJ personality type), overstepping is a very negative feeling for Jill.
For me, some may think I overdress every day because I work alone at home – so I don’t have anyone else around me to relate to so I can’t use that as a metric, yet for me it’s not my best because I know I perform better when I’m feeling good. I feel overdressed because I want to feel like my version of myself. A relatively stylish outfit is worth it to me. As a J (Judgment) type (INTJ), I like to be prepared, and so being brought together every day means that if an unexpected meeting happens, I never have to change my outfit or panic that I’m not there. appropriately dressed.
Here’s a typical day in my home office – would this overdress or underdress for you?
What is your preference?
We’d love to know what you think of this question – please let us know in the comments – and if you know your psychological type as well, we’d love to know what it is and why. How far from the appropriate/ideal would you rather be – more or less dressed?
Discover More About Your Style Type
If you’d like to learn more about why you have these preferences and how they relate to your personality, we’d like to invite you to explore more. Your Style Type is your program This delves into your approach to style in relation to your psychological type. We only open doors once a year, if that interests you discover more here. Learn how you can set what is right for you and how you can set style information that is not right for you.
[ad_2]
Source link